Blogroll
-
Recent Posts
Archives
- January 2016
- February 2015
- September 2014
- February 2014
- October 2013
- July 2013
- April 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
Categories
Tweets
- RT @katiepotter: Arthur Weasley @WilliamBlumberg visiting the @HarryPotterNY store today! We got so excited over the new Weasley Car Pillow…...tweeted 1 year ago
- RT @wizard_pancake: このナギニに噛まれて怪我したアーサーの仮装をした方たちが動画に登場♪ @WilliamBlumberg https://t.co/lmYqcCPt1H...tweeted 2 years ago
- RT @NESCAC: Anxiety disorders are the most common mental health issues in the U.S. Data shows that more than 30 percent of student-athletes…...tweeted 3 years ago
- RT @PotterWorldUK: Happy 59th Birthday to Mark Williams! He played Arthur Weasley in the Harry Potter Films. #HappyBirthdayMarkWilliams htt…...tweeted 4 years ago
Category Archives: Philosophy
Pagan Perspectives and Interactions
What is a Pagan Perspective? Note the hedge of ‘a Pagan Perspective’ ensuring that the multiplicity of Pagan voices be given adequate space. These voices will give rise to questions on some of the themes presented by both Schwartz and … Continue reading
Five Ethical Issues with Future Generations
Ernest Partridge, in his “On the Rights of Future Generations,” examines five particular problems when dealing with future generations: the re-population paradox (which is based upon Schwartz’s ideas),[1] temporal remoteness, ‘No-claims’ argument, non-actuality, and indeterminacy.[2] As seen with Schwartz’s challenge … Continue reading
Thomas Schwartz and the Identifiable Fallacy
Thomas Schwartz, in his “Obligations to Posterity,” claims that there are no moral obligations to future persons based on the identifiable fallacy.[1]Any action that changes the future means that those persons born would be different than those who would have … Continue reading
Who Speaks for Future Generations?
Who speaks for future generations? When I say that ‘we should protect the environment for the future,’ what moral or legal authority do I speak from? By future persons, individuals or generations, I mean those who live non-concurrent lives to … Continue reading
The How to of Daily Ethics: Why I like Randy Cohen
I was falling behind on listening to some podcasts when I realized that Randy Cohen produced his last edition of “The Ethicist” for The New York Times. I found Randy insightful and humorous; however, more importantly, he was willing to … Continue reading
Responsibilities to Future Generations
One consideration in sustainability is our responsibilities to future generations. This topic often falls under applied ethics and has close ties to environmental ethics. However, applied ethics has concerns with relationships between individual persons. One problem that arises with dealing … Continue reading
Love and Emotions and Robert C. Solomon
Solomon, Robert C. About Love: Reinventing Romance for Our Times. Lanham, Maryland: Madison Books, 2001. Robert C. Solomon was the Quincy Lee Centennial Professor of Philosophy and Business at University of Texas at Austin whose untimely passing caused me great … Continue reading
Tsunami, Taking Actions, and Piety
I woke this morning and checked my twitter account (@williamblumberg) to find that a major earthquake occurred near Japan and that a tsunami had already impacted some coastal areas in Japan. My heart goes out to all those affected by … Continue reading
Ritual as Dissipation System
Ritual operates as a self-organizing dissipation system for ontological embodiment. Philosophers really know how to take all the fun out of something like ritual. Permit me to rephrase by saying that ritual permits the flow of energy, which is akin … Continue reading
Posted in Philosophy, Piety, Ritual
Tagged Non-equilibrium Thermodynamics, Philosophy, piety, Ritual
Leave a comment
Aristotle and Confucius are Friends
Yu, Jiyuan. The Ethics of Confucius and Aristotle: Mirrors of Virtue. New York: Routledge, 2007. There are dangers with comparative philosophy. These include incommensurability, relativism, misinterpretations and heavy reliance on secondary sources (language), and Eurocentric standards. Jiyuan Yu faces all … Continue reading